To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 482
481  |  483
Subject: 
Re: Proposed Monorail from 4.5v Track. Not built. Thoughts only
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Fri, 22 Jan 1999 23:13:58 GMT
Viewed: 
1523 times
  
Gregor Benedikt Rochow writes:
Maybe you could use *only* one of the two 4.5v radius curves:  either the
inner, and smaller, radius curve with the smooth top surface; or use the
outer , larger, radius curve with the 'toothed' top surface.

Or use both and have parallel double curves...

That is great point.  However, the tracks would need to be spaced 4 radial
studs from each other for the path to remain truly parallel to one another
throughout an entire circle, and I'm not sure how wide a monorail train for
this single 4.5v track would be.   Parallel double curves for independent
trains are something no LEGO train system, that I know of, has had.  To be able
to lay smooth parallel curves would be very nice.

For the train itself:

I envision a three wheel set up to both guide and support a train on the
single track.  One wheel would roll along the top surface of the track.
Two wheels would roll in a plane parallel to the ground, one on either
side of the track to keep the train on the track.  Two of these tri-wheel
assemblies would be connected to either end of a train car via a pivot
above this tri-wheel assembly that would rotate in a plane parallel to the
ground.

The above design would likely wobble to some degree if the two side wheels
are not close enough to the track.

No problem, make them spring-(or rubber-band-)loaded.

Good point.

Power to top-riding wheel might be provided through a Technic motor
driving a Technic axled wheel.  However, there are rotation issues
concerning the drive mechanism that I can foresee, but have no thoughtful
solution other than a universal joint or (LEGO Brand) rubber band ;-).

What issues?

I'm not sure if my loose idea would work or not, and I simply don't think I can
visualize nor describe the drive mechanism to my working satisfaction with
trying to actually build it.  Unforeseen issues.

<snip monorail skirts and track structure supports>

If this discussion gives anyone the motivation to try it out, or if you've
already tried it, I'd love to hear about your efforts and level of
success.

I haven't tried it yet, but thought about it for quite a while.

-gbr

Later,
James Mathis



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Proposed Monorail from 4.5v Track. Not built. Thoughts only
 
(...) Or use both and have parallel double curves... (...) No problem, make them spring-(or rubber-band-)loaded. (...) What issues? (...) ...and makes them a rather sorry excuse for a monorail - 2-track wheels on a flat surface an all... (...) Not (...) (26 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR