To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 482
481  |  483
Subject: 
Re: Proposed Monorail from 4.5v Track. Not built. Thoughts only
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Fri, 22 Jan 1999 23:13:58 GMT
Viewed: 
2979 times
  
Gregor Benedikt Rochow writes:
> > Maybe you could use *only* one of the two 4.5v radius curves:  either the
> > inner, and smaller, radius curve with the smooth top surface; or use the
> > outer , larger, radius curve with the 'toothed' top surface.
> 
> Or use both and have parallel double curves...

That is great point.  However, the tracks would need to be spaced 4 radial
studs from each other for the path to remain truly parallel to one another
throughout an entire circle, and I'm not sure how wide a monorail train for
this single 4.5v track would be.   Parallel double curves for independent
trains are something no LEGO train system, that I know of, has had.  To be able
to lay smooth parallel curves would be very nice.

> > For the train itself:
> > 
> > I envision a three wheel set up to both guide and support a train on the
> > single track.  One wheel would roll along the top surface of the track.
> > Two wheels would roll in a plane parallel to the ground, one on either
> > side of the track to keep the train on the track.  Two of these tri-wheel
> > assemblies would be connected to either end of a train car via a pivot
> > above this tri-wheel assembly that would rotate in a plane parallel to the
> > ground.
> > 
> > The above design would likely wobble to some degree if the two side wheels
> > are not close enough to the track.
> 
> No problem, make them spring-(or rubber-band-)loaded.

Good point.

> > Power to top-riding wheel might be provided through a Technic motor
> > driving a Technic axled wheel.  However, there are rotation issues
> > concerning the drive mechanism that I can foresee, but have no thoughtful
> > solution other than a universal joint or (LEGO Brand) rubber band ;-).
> 
> What issues?

I'm not sure if my loose idea would work or not, and I simply don't think I can
visualize nor describe the drive mechanism to my working satisfaction with
trying to actually build it.  Unforeseen issues.

<snip monorail skirts and track structure supports>

> > If this discussion gives anyone the motivation to try it out, or if you've
> > already tried it, I'd love to hear about your efforts and level of
> > success.
> 
> I haven't tried it yet, but thought about it for quite a while.
> 
> -gbr

Later,
James Mathis



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Proposed Monorail from 4.5v Track. Not built. Thoughts only
 
(...) Or use both and have parallel double curves... (...) No problem, make them spring-(or rubber-band-)loaded. (...) What issues? (...) ...and makes them a rather sorry excuse for a monorail - 2-track wheels on a flat surface an all... (...) Not (...) (28 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR