 | | Re: Shay #5
|
|
(...) I thought that when numbers like this were used for narrow gauge they were in reference to the gauge of the rails in feet? As in On3 for 3 feet or 36" gauge while On2&1/2 was two and a half feet or 30" gauge. I've also heard of On2, but never (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Shay #5
|
|
(...) Ah, well, you lost me. I never said anything about 36"; the "3" in On3 is short for 30"... Actually, I was shooting from the hip in my initial post-- I just found that link after your post-- weren't you blathering something about HOn3? :-) (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | AdeLUG's #5 - Write up
|
|
Here is the write up for the Adelaide LEGO Users Group meeting #5 It can also be found at the AdeLUG's website: (URL) - AdeLUG's #5, Sunday 10 November 2002 THEME - Moonbase Project VENUE - Holdfast Bay Community Centre, Hove (about 20mins (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.au.sa.ade, lugnet.castle, lugnet.fabuland, lugnet.space, lugnet.town, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: NGLTC Greenberg show pictures
|
|
(...) They were available in service packs, you'd get 8 concave (inner corner), 8 convex (outer corner), some top pieces (double sided slopes), and some regular slopes. These packes were great, too bad they don''t sell them anymore. As soon as they (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: NGLTC Greenberg show pictures
|
|
"James Seibert" <james@vci.net> wrote in message news:H5G0AK.53D@lugnet.com... (...) in (...) [ ... snipped ... ] A couple of years ago LEGO released service pack 5216: (URL) was still available up until three or four months ago as I recall. I wish (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: NGLTC Greenberg show pictures
|
|
After being inspired and awed by the train engines, I noticed the houses in the picture below. (URL) did you find all the black corner roof pieces for the houses in this picture? "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Train that runs on tires.
|
|
Hi, Here is a page with some good prototype information: (URL) top of the page is the history of the system, the bottom shows the current implementation (including what happens if a tire runs flat...). Greetings, David (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
|
|
(...) The 1-11-3 design isn't very close at all, according to Track Designer. Here's what I did: straight, curve right, 11 straights (5 switches and a straight, but that is equivalent), 3 curves right, cross-track. Then from the cross-track, a bunch (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
|
|
(...) This is very interesting... Is there a similar formula for a dog-leg? 1 curve, X straights, 1 curve the other way? What equations/formulae would you use to compute this? It's been way too many years since I studied trigonometry... --Bill. (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Shay #5
|
|
Hey that's really nice, I like the details. Eric (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
