 | | Re: Trainiacs can rejoice
|
|
(...) I agree James,i hope there is alot more then that to come. (24 years ago, 22-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Trainiacs can rejoice
|
|
(...) Who cares? It's not like it isn't news :). So, Greg was a bit slow on picking up on it, he still did pick up on it (well before I get a S@H catalog too..."I'm going to be very angry indeed" if it is a US only item :). James (24 years ago, 22-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Trainiacs can rejoice
|
|
(...) I had to needle you a little Greg it's not often i see something before alot of other people(or am right about something) (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Supertrain Success - more pics
|
|
(...) Nice job on the long shots... that's one thing the Mavica doesn't go a great job on; it tends to pixilate too much for good long focus shots. You also got a shot that I didn't think to grab - the mountain in pieces: (URL) large chunk in the (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug, lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Trainiacs can rejoice
|
|
(...) :-| sorry... I looked back about a day or so and didn't see anything, so I assumed it was news. I'll check more thoroughly next time. (24 years ago, 22-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Trainiacs can rejoice
|
|
(...) This is the 3rd time;-) Josh (24 years ago, 22-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Trainiacs can rejoice
|
|
(...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Trainiacs can rejoice
|
|
There is a new train pictured in the Spring 2001 S@H catalogue... and it looks good! (URL) "Contrary to popular belief, a rubber band is not appropriate swim attire" Majewski (URL) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | PNLTC Portland GATs event! Wow!
|
|
This latest round of club train shows is very impressive. From Supertrain2001 to the alt history of GMLTC to PNLTC's PDX GATs event. My web-browser is exhausted! Huge layouts are getting a lot of attention, and I think the the surge is great. I've (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Supertrain Success - more pics
|
|
SRC wrote in message ... (...) I've scanned more shots of the NALUG layout at Supertrain: (URL) you can see, the layout was quite large. We were fortunate that we managed to get everthing reasonably presentable in time. Let us know what you think. (...) (24 years ago, 22-Feb-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug, lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: An alternate history of the GMLTC layout
|
|
(...) And I was just getting to like you, eric! >;^D -John (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Edward the Blue Engine
|
|
(...) This is so unique! Love it! I especially like how the build style for the boiler face is extended throughout the boiler. Clever :-) later, James Mathis (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.jp)
|
| |
| | Re: An alternate history of the GMLTC layout
|
|
(...) Much! eric (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: An alternate history of the GMLTC layout
|
|
(...) It's worth noting I'm not a Mac user. I just have a really outdated version of Netscape. eric (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: An alternate history of the GMLTC layout
|
|
There, all better? I can see in Netscape 4.7 (PC) anyways.... oh.. and John 2? I still think you're crazy. <grin> (and yes, I know.. </grin>) -john 3 jkelly69@skypoint is a refuge for spam, haven't checked it in months cuz I don't own the account (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: An alternate history of the GMLTC layout
|
|
Actually that makes sense to me then John, I thought you said you couldn't find the page period. I probably have a mismatched table tag. I was just to lazy to look at in netscape 4. I forget how many mac users there are in this bunch. I gave up on (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: An alternate history of the GMLTC layout
|
|
(...) All I get is the cool train station thing in Netscape 4.7 (Mac) too; however, I can view the source. Chris (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Whither LEGO Steam Trains? (was Re: QT Movie of 4565)
|
|
This may want to followup somewhere other than trains, but I can't decide where... (...) I think you'd be wrong there. You think you'd enjoy it, but you wouldn't. Because after turning the train on, what is there to do? Nothing, really. Powering (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: An alternate history of the GMLTC layout
|
|
(...) I'm kinda glad y'all said so, cuz I think J-3 thought I was crazy when I said I couldn't see it either (ver 4.5) -J-2 (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: An alternate history of the GMLTC layout
|
|
(...) Was blank for me as well, I'm currently using 4.07. I'm not interested enough to set up Internet Exploiter to read it, though I will concede I should probably d/l a new copy of Netscape. eric (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
