 | | Re: City blocks
|
| (...) I was thinking a max size so that the cross roads would work and so there is a "standard" to work with.(my whole point of this)and we get a more block feel. (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.town)
| | | | | Re: City blocks
|
| Chris Leach wrote in message ... (...) is (...) feel. I like towns where the blocks are not all the same size, personally, and it's often necessary to fit into a given table area. If there was no max size, there would be nothing stopping you (...) (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.town)
| | | | | Re: City blocks
|
| (...) Ok... now the fun part is we still need to come up a good standard for connecting buildings....:-) (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.town)
| | | | | Re: City blocks
|
| (...) If I am following this right, standard block 2 x 3, add roads on 2, 3 or 4 sides depending on placement in block group. If you fill the block, then attachment to other buildings would be self contained on your block. Sidewalks would be on road (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.town)
| | | | | Re: City blocks
|
| (...) Matthew if you can fill a 2x3 or more block then that works.But what we are now talking about are people builing on just one baseplate(for those who do not wish to build more or can't build larger).If we can come up with a good system we can (...) (22 years ago, 25-Sep-02, to lugnet.town)
| |
