 | | Re: baby walker —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | It works! (URL) stability is obtained more from wire stiffness than from 2x4 brick (not heavy enough, without wire motor would turn over when in topmost position) Cheers, Philo www.philohome.com (...) (22 years ago, 5-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: baby walker —James Loewen
|
| | | | (...) Cool! I figured that the stiffness of the wire would help. I guess I'll call it Shorty ,as it's only a little over an inch tall :). Now I've just got to get that micro motor ordered so I can try it out myself. I'm wondering if you could try (...) (22 years ago, 5-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: baby walker —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | ...and then they were five... The 1x7 liftarm is a bit short and the motor bumps against the flexible axle. So I used a 1x9 (7+2) to be low enough, and I could remove Micromotor bottom. I used a 1x2 liftarm with plate only for aestetical reasons... (...) (22 years ago, 5-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: baby walker —Travis Kunce
|
| | | | | after watching that film, i got to say that this is fun but its totally not a walker. first foremost for that leg drag, I'd rename this Igor or somthing. -tk "Philippe Hurbain" <philohome@free.fr> wrote in message news:HCvtts.nF@lugnet.com... (...) (...) (22 years ago, 5-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: baby walker —James Loewen
|
| | | | | (...) Very cool! Thanks for trying out the design for me, I would have worked on it myself, but I'm glad you could help me out. I'm wondering, did the design with 7 pieces get its foot totally off the ground? I think lego is actually making a (...) (22 years ago, 5-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: baby walker —James Loewen
|
| | | | (...) I was just thinking about the design and that I would really like to have it lift its foot off the ground, and I think I have something. I think that a 1x7 liftarm with an 18 long flex tube would be a touch smaller and allow the foot to clear (...) (22 years ago, 6-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: baby walker —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | (...) Actually no, the double bent liftarm has no point where it balances perfectly. (...) yes, (URL) (but I've none yet!) (...) Sure you can !!! (...) Yes it works, but to rise the foot completely you have to add the bottom motor part. I had a (...) (22 years ago, 6-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: baby walker —James Loewen
|
| | | | (...) Thanks, I'll be trying it out soon myself. I figured that if it lifted its foot off the ground, it would more easily be considered a walker. I hope you have fun watching it stomp around :). -jrl P.S. Are you planning on taking any pics? (22 years ago, 6-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: baby walker —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | (...) Here they are: The 5 pieces version looks really disproportionate: (URL) 6 pieces is nicer and "walks" well: (URL) (350K) Philo www.philohome.com (22 years ago, 6-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: baby walker —James Loewen
|
| | | | | (...) Great! The six piece design is nicer all around, but I guess if someone wants the design with one less piece, the fiver is kind of neat in its own way. This is actually less than an inch tall! I guess that probably classifies it as the (...) (22 years ago, 6-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: baby walker —Paul Kleniewski
|
| | | | "Philippe Hurbain" <philohome@free.fr> wrote in message news:HCxAx3.1zrL@lugnet.com... (...) hi i suspected that you guys can beat me during weekend it's true with just one "but" do we count the electric connector? i do see my design (however (...) (22 years ago, 7-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: baby walker —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | Hello ! (...) ;o)) (...) No, it was not included in count. Actually, your mini7_01 has the same part count as monopod6. (...) What did you use to secure triangle on the crankshaft ? (...) Actually I didn't create the bent part in (URL) as an (...) (22 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: baby walker —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | | (...) Oh yes, it's a Technic Axle Towball ! Philo (22 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: baby walker —Paul Kleniewski
|
| | | | hi philo sorry i forgot to send PM folder (URL) you can see i used axle pin with tow ball because the krankshaft is "reversed" it saves one piece :) (...) when i create .mpd file i cannot use models on one drawing i mean switching between models (...) (22 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: baby walker —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | (...) In your "readme" file (URL) please give credit to James Loewen, this is his design MUCH more than mine !!! (...) From MLcad help file: "Inserting a sub-model as a part In the "Available Parts" pane and in the "Part preview" pane there is a (...) (22 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: baby walker —Paul Kleniewski
|
| | | | ok done with info.txt thanx very much for your help philo pixel (22 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
