Subject:
|
Re: I thought as much
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 16:03:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1286 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Steven Lane writes:
> http://www.lugnet.com/quickset/search.cgi?q=1221,1&w=0
>
> This scan shows an old accessory pack of (pre studless) Lego elements.
>
> It cleary describes them as beams. So can we stop calling beams, bricks,
> when they're obviously beams, and can we call the new imposters studless
> beams therefore creating a clear naming convention and avoiding confusion.
>
> Steve
>
> Who would happily use studless beams, but I can't get them in quantity either.
Bricks have studs,
Beams do not,
They are good,
For some SNOT.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | I thought as much
|
| (URL) scan shows an old accessory pack of (pre studless) Lego elements. It cleary describes them as beams. So can we stop calling beams, bricks, when they're obviously beams, and can we call the new imposters studless beams therefore creating a (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
