Subject:
|
Re: Legal connection combinations
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 Jul 2002 16:57:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
555 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Thomas Avery writes:
<snip>
> I've often wondered about this myself. I suppose you wouldn't find that type
> of fit in any official Lego-produced creation. But it is all 100% Lego, so I
> say it's Good!
>
> -TJ
<snip>
Once reading that I was sure I encountered "illegal" connections in many
official sets, but I couldn't remember any specific example.
After some thinking I came up only with:
Before the introduction of <part:32002> a common practice was to insert the
"wrong" end of <part:4274> into a technic hole.
As in:
<http://library.brickshelf.com/scans/8000/8460/8460-009.html>
And many other places.
I didn't do the exact math, but I suspect the connection of the tail at six
points is not likely to be in perfect Lego geometry:
<http://library.brickshelf.com/scans/8000/8485/8485-050.html>
Pretty lame, I'm sure there are much better examples. Anyone?
- David
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Legal connection combinations
|
| (...) I seem to remember they've inserted studs into technic holes before, which is a bit sus - can't find an example though. Also squeezing a plate between 2 rows of studs to get a 90 deg angle. Both of these are "close enough" but if left for long (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jul-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Legal connection combinations
|
| (...) Thanks. And that link would be??? (URL) This involves using two outer brace peices 4 units (...) I've often wondered about this myself. I suppose you wouldn't find that type of fit in any official Lego-produced creation. But it is all 100% (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
