To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / 7185
7184  |  7186
Subject: 
Re: SSPP: To keep or not?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic
Date: 
Sat, 30 Mar 2002 21:58:49 GMT
Viewed: 
1679 times
  
On Sat, 30 Mar 2002 17:25:07 GMT, "Thomas Avery"
<thomas.avery@intec-hou.com> wrote:

> Tobbe,
> 
> I think the SSPP contest is great, but perhaps not attractive to some
> people. It's a great challenge to make anything capable of pulling weight,
> but it is very limiting.

Well, like I said, most motorized sets do have enough gears to make
the wheels slip so it'll all be a question of getting the parts (max
weight) in there and make them press down on the wheels.

> I think it's more attractive to have a contest that would result in a
> "normal" MOC. This means allowing unlimited parts to be used.
> 
> Given the low frequency of new MOCs in the Technic and Model Team groups, I
> think it's better to not limit the parts used. So when a builder creates
> something, they can create the MOC they really want and also participate in
> the contest.

Hmmmm...

> However, this type of power pulling contest already exists with Todd's
> competition, but his weight classes only extend to 5 pounds. MOCs like my
> tractor and Steve Lane's Rotinoff (I suspect) weigh over 5 pounds. I don't
> know if Todd plans to create heavier classes or not, but they're definitely
> needed (hint-hint: Tobbe's Ultra-Heavy Class Power Puller Contest).

I had plans for an additional "no rules lifting" class when I designed
the challenge but scrapped the idea.

5 pounds is not much when it comes to our MOC's but there's also the
"100% LEGO" rule which disallowes RC of most kinds and when I build
big I want it in there.

Furthermore it's all about ratios so the size of the MOC does not
count I think.

I'm still trying to get more weight pulled then the MOC itself and it
looks like it's a surface question here, again friction is the key.
I'll try sandpaper since Todd's rules currently don't specifiy the
surface.

> There are other "power" contests that you can have. You could do one for
> cranes and have the heaviest lift competition.

That's a good idea too. Perhaps a better idea then the hunt for
friction that pulling's about.

Who'll be the first to lift him/herself with LEGO? :) Wow, that would
mean a _lot_ of pulleys to distract the weight and let's not forget
the string... Yikes!

> As for MoTeC: YES, definitely keep it!

No worries mate, it's there to stay!
/Tobbe

http://www.arnesson.nu/lotek/



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: SSPP: To keep or not?
 
Tobbe, I think the SSPP contest is great, but perhaps not attractive to some people. It's a great challenge to make anything capable of pulling weight, but it is very limiting. I think it's more attractive to have a contest that would result in a (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)

9 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR