 | | Re: Thoughts on 8448 (compared to 8880) —Dave Baum
| | | | I do one of two things with my sets: A) If it was an interesting model that I'd like to build again, I put it back in its own box. In this case, I hardly ever go back to it for individual parts - perhaps I pull out a few unique parts (leaving a note (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Thoughts on 8448 (compared to 8880) —Tim Rueger
| | | | | (...) Ah. My "problem", then, is that I only buy interesting sets. :^) I truly admire Lego's design ingenuity, and I really like building sets like 8880, 8480, 8868, etc., just to admire their techniques. I guess I should start buying up some bulk (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Thoughts on 8448 (compared to 8880) —Dave Baum
| | | | | (...) I had that same problem too - basically I decided to "sacrifice" my 8480 to make it bulk parts. Plus any small or mid-sized set (8440, etc) winds up as bulk. I can still build it if I want - in fact picking the parts from my sorted bins is a (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | | |
