 | | RE: killing off technic —William Howard
| | | | (...) catalogues to see what lies in store, only to be unimpressed. Cars, cars, cars, cars, cars, bionicle (great parts, lousy idea), cars, starwars (hated it the first time round when I was 14, and its not getting any better, just better hyped IMHO (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: killing off technic —Ross Crawford
| | | | | | (...) But remember, in 1980 even technic beams were still "kinda new"! ROSCO (22 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: killing off technic —Rob Reed
| | | | | This is a quote from an article in Business 2.0 [October 2001]: (URL) a private firm, Lego doesn't have to explain itself to anyone in the outside world, but in March the company issued a press release announcing that it had had a lousy year in (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: killing off technic —Jack Gregory
| | | | | Yes, but one only need look at Gallidor or whatever it is to see that they don't understand what "lost focus" means. Plus software, watches, etc. It is clear that the marketing people think they have to go after this "new kind of kid" who isn't (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | | |
