 | | new group —Jared Schmitz
|
| | | I would like to start a new group for technic cranes. Does anyone know how i would go about doing this? thanks Jared (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: new group —Maggie Cambron
|
| | | | | (...) Compartmentalized dork alert!! :-) Maggie C. (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: new group —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) Well, you'd post to lugnet.admin.general asking for it, however I'm not sure it's really needed - what would you discuss there that can't be discussed in lugnet.technic? It's not exactly a high volume group, and most people reading it would (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: new group —David Arnon
|
| | | | | I agree. I think cranes are certainly part of Technic and I wouldn't like to check another group every time I check for new posts. - David (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: new group —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | | | (...) I thought that same thing early last year and tried to get a new group listed under robotics called .sensors After hearing all arguments against that, I started subscribing to the whole .robotics group and now do searches for posts including (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: new group —Thomas Avery
|
| | | | (...) I agree with you there. Lugnet has many "compartments" already. A .crane group would be a bit too much. However, some builders of cranes (as we've seen recently) prefer to post in the Model Team group. I guess they feel that their creations (...) (23 years ago, 30-Nov-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
