 | | Re: scanning for new parts —Adrian Egli
|
| | | You're right, it does look like the 32186 of the 8448! When I look closely at the main photo, I can see some bevel gears, but it's not clear enough if they are within a diff housing above a 16 tooth gear and did something like what was done to the (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: scanning for new parts —Thomas (T. J.) Avery
|
| | | | | What I would like Lego to do is make more pictures and descriptions available. How much would it cost them to post a few more pictures of 8466 (and others, too) on the Net or simply put more text descriptions? We could get a better look at the beast (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: scanning for new parts —Gaurav Thakur
|
| | | | | | | (...) That is a very nice idea...it would really help to know exactly what you're buying. People would not be forced to find a parts inventory list or head for Brickshelf to see what elements the set comes with. Looks like the 8465 and 8466 will (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: scanning for new parts —Adrian Egli
|
| | | | | | "Thomas (T. J.) Avery" <thomas.avery@intec-hou.com> wrote in message news:GG2A1F.GLK@lugnet.com... (...) could (...) are (...) I know what you mean. Lego has this facination of driving us nuts. Being a Technic fan more than the other themes, I (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | It isn't the same! (was:Re: scanning for new parts) —Nathan Falslev
|
| | | | I could be mistaken but I'm pretty darn sure it's not the same part! The new (currently yellow) piece has a larger hole through which some kind of u-joint moves. It also has an extra bit of plastic between main body and the extended ball joint, (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
