 | | Re: Linear Actuator
|
|
The only way I can see these being cheaper to produce is if they have no matel parts at all which would make them even worse. And yes you would need a means to power them throuh a series of gears and universal joints which I think could be more (...) (17 years ago, 23-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Crane...
|
|
(...) Wish I did. :-) Steve (17 years ago, 22-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Crane...
|
|
(...) Yeah, Steve, those are all mine...That was at BF 06' They are all still together with the exception of the truck mounted one. The superstructure and boom is still together, but I tore apart the "truck" part of it to rebuild in the near (...) (17 years ago, 22-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Crane...
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Oh. My. Goodness!!! That would hurt if it fell on you! Once again the LEGO builders--in whatever theme--never cease to astound me! Nicely done! Dave K (17 years ago, 22-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Crane...
|
|
(...) That's a lot of cranes. Are they all yours? (...) I know I'd like to know. Steve (17 years ago, 22-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Crane...
|
|
(...) It worked pretty well for me on this one: (URL) all of these: (URL) have had no problems with the two parts coming apart....If you can tell by this pic, the red and white one is holding up a 8421 almost 8 feet away from the center of (...) (17 years ago, 22-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Crane...
|
|
(...) Thanks, read about it (URL) here>. ROSCO (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Crane...
|
|
(...) Great crane Rosco, shame their's no accompanying text. Steve (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Crane...
|
|
(...) Yes, that is correct. (...) See also (URL) technique> - this allowed me to lift the whole crane base up by the superstructure. ROSCO (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New Crane...
|
|
(...) Mine has that. (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Technicopedia Update
|
|
I have to say that's an absolutely amazing site! Fascinating stuff, I have it bookmarked and I'm looking forward to the rest of your updates! :-) (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Crane...
|
|
(...) This is correct. Real cranes have roller bearings that are pinned in place that bear the weight and force of the superstructure where it is connected to the base. (...) I am going to use a threaded axle through the center to hold the plates (...) (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | What should happen with the lugnet.robotics.nxt sidebar?
|
|
Hello, LUGNET readers. In case you don't know, I'm the lugnet.robotics.nxt curator. I used to update the NXT section sidebar with [in]frequent regularity, but during the last couple months I've not done anything to it. I get busy and/or don't take (...) (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.robotics.nxt, lugnet.technic, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: Linear Actuator
|
|
(...) Obviously with *my* interests, I hope that the linear actuator is not the end of pneumatics. There are still a lot of ideas I've not had a chance to try, but more part type options are great! Kevin (www.kclague.net) (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Linear Actuator
|
|
The more I think about the new linear actuator the more applications I think up for it, but I was just wondering is it actually going to be significantly cheaper to make than the pneumatic system? I know you won't need a pump, valve block or pipes, (...) (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Panel Fairings?
|
|
(...) Gordons's right, I'm currently pro the new fairings. I like my parts to be made up of recognisable geometric shapes and have lines of symmetry :-). (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Crane...
|
|
I can't see from your photos how you're stopping the main structure lifting off the base. Correct me if I'm wrong, but crane turntables hold the superstructure down so the load moment is transferred to the crawler base. I've seen photos of cranes (...) (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Panel Fairings?
|
|
(...) He's not saying the new ones are less useful, He's saying the new ones couldn't be worse than the old ones. In other words, the old ones are a useless as they could be. (17 years ago, 21-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Panel Fairings?
|
|
(...) I wasn't referring to the old fairings. I was referring to the new fairings. Being that they have pin holes on both ends, I would have thought they gave you more of an opportunity to "close up". They could be used in co-operation with old (...) (17 years ago, 20-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Panel Fairings?
|
|
(...) I think it's because I always think things should be "closed up". If I was say building a truck and putting fairings on the side I'd build it from bricks and plates so it would be rectangular, you' can't do that with the old fairings. (17 years ago, 20-Feb-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
