To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / 1618
1617  |  1619
Subject: 
Re: Why Lego, Why
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic
Date: 
Mon, 12 Jun 2000 23:51:08 GMT
Viewed: 
1206 times
  
"Matthew Miller" <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message
news:slrn8k9lp5.rt8.mattdm@jadzia.bu.edu...

I don't think that this is meant to be a substitute for the pneumatic
system. It's just a fancier shock absorber.

Yeah, I'm pretty sure that that is all it's mean to be. Just a spring with
an inbuilt dampener, so that it has a much slower rebound. If you used one
of the 'normal' springs on there, the doors on the 8448 would probably pop
up too fast for the eye to see. :)


David Drew.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why Lego, Why
 
(...) I don't think that this is meant to be a substitute for the pneumatic system. It's just a fancier shock absorber. [ ft -> .technic ] (24 years ago, 12-Jun-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)

6 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR