| |
Geoffrey Hyde <ghyde@ledanet.com.au> wrote:
> IMHO, that's a really poor substitute for real pneumatics, and is in no way
> hydraulic. I don't mean to be sounding mad or anything, but can't TLG stick
> with something that actually works? Pneumatics is quite powerful, but it
I don't think that this is meant to be a substitute for the pneumatic
system. It's just a fancier shock absorber.
[ ft -> .technic ]
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Why Lego, Why
|
| "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message news:slrn8k9lp5.rt8.....bu.edu... (...) Yeah, I'm pretty sure that that is all it's mean to be. Just a spring with an inbuilt dampener, so that it has a much slower rebound. If you used one of (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jun-00, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Why Lego, Why
|
| Is that like those compressed-air automatic door dampeners and closers? IMHO, that's a really poor substitute for real pneumatics, and is in no way hydraulic. I don't mean to be sounding mad or anything, but can't TLG stick with something that (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jun-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
