 | | Re: Two New GBC Modules.. —Jean-Marc Nimal
|
| | | (...) Thanks! I knew of that site (which is very great GBC inspiration indeed), but I never really looked at the mechanism there. This is just too great to have any remorse shamelessly copying :-/ I wonder if regular cams (6575) might work too, I (...) (17 years ago, 12-Aug-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Two New GBC Modules.. —Jordan Bradford
|
| | | | (...) Speaking of remorseless shameless copying, I spent an hour and half last night trying to build the crankshaft. I can't figure out the pattern those pulley wheels are using, especially how much space is between them. It doesn't look like the (...) (17 years ago, 13-Aug-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Two New GBC Modules.. —Jason J Railton
|
| | | | (...) It's hard to tell from that picture, but pause the video and you'll see the balls run up at a 6-stud spacing. That means the peaks of the wave are six studs apart. The cams are spaced with one pulley plus a half bush, so are spaced exactly one (...) (17 years ago, 14-Aug-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Two New GBC Modules.. —Jordan Bradford
|
| | | | I built it last night. My earlier problem was in trying to use 4-stud axles to hold the pulleys in their offset position -- this is hard to describe, but the gist of it is the axles sometimes got in the way of other pulleys and warped their (...) (17 years ago, 15-Aug-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| | | | |
