To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / 14161
14160  |  14162
Subject: 
Re: Relative or absolute?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic
Date: 
Thu, 12 May 2005 15:11:32 GMT
Viewed: 
6427 times
  
In lugnet.technic, Nathanael Kuipers wrote:
> In lugnet.technic, Nathan Bell wrote:
> > Does anyone think Lego design is relative or absolute?  I have been discussing
> > it with Nathanael Kuipers and have decided that functionality is mostly
> > absolute, but aesthetics is relative.  But that is just my opinion.  What do the
> > rest of you think?
> > 
> > Nathan Bell
> 
> It's an interesting question, but what's much more important is that we have fun
> with our designs.
> 
> Nate

My design will be functionally absolute, while being artistically relative.

PS: Good question!



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Relative or absolute?
 
(...) It's an interesting question, but what's much more important is that we have fun with our designs. Nate (21 years ago, 12-May-05, to lugnet.technic)

11 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR