To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / 14159
14158  |  14160
Subject: 
Re: Relative or absolute?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic
Date: 
Thu, 12 May 2005 14:06:01 GMT
Viewed: 
3208 times
  
In lugnet.technic, Nathan Bell wrote:
Does anyone think Lego design is relative or absolute?  I have been discussing
it with Nathanael Kuipers and have decided that functionality is mostly
absolute, but aesthetics is relative.  But that is just my opinion.  What do the
rest of you think?

Nathan Bell

It's an interesting question, but what's much more important is that we have fun
with our designs.

Nate



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Relative or absolute?
 
(...) My design will be functionally absolute, while being artistically relative. PS: Good question! (20 years ago, 12-May-05, to lugnet.technic)

Message is in Reply To:
  Relative or absolute?
 
Does anyone think Lego design is relative or absolute? I have been discussing it with Nathanael Kuipers and have decided that functionality is mostly absolute, but aesthetics is relative. But that is just my opinion. What do the rest of you think? (...) (20 years ago, 19-Apr-05, to lugnet.technic)

11 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR