 | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | (...) Yes it looks like (but I can't quite see how) it has a 3-section boom, which may be what the more powerful RC motor is being used for. (...) Well the 2 on this page (URL) both seem to indicate set number 7249, so I'm not sure whats going on (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Jindrich Kubec
|
| | | | | (...) First one is a prototype. The one on the following photo is the Real McCrane ;-) (...) I cant's see anything like that? The boom is made of 3 large elements, 12 studs long, 3 bricks tall, 4 studs wide. Two of such elements hold the outriggers. (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | (...) Hmmm maybe you're right, and those elements are used to hold the outriggers too. I thought the 2-stud section at each end of those was separate, but looking at the boom, that isn't really possible. Oh well, maybe not as useful as I first (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Ronald Borchert
|
| | | | (...) Hi, this is _my_ original picture: (URL) scanned the official 2005 german dealer catalog at 27-11-2004. The crane pic is from the back side of the catalog. In the middle of the catalog the crane was shown with box, but it was very bad to scan. (...) (20 years ago, 5-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Jindrich Kubec
|
| | | | (...) Not. This is the one for the release. (...) Most of the boxes in the early dealers catalogs are just mockups anyway. (...) This IMO proves my point. The pics I posted (with the kostky.org logo) are the pics of the real thing which will be in (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction? —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | (...) What is your source for the 8421 reference? TIA, Philo (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
