 | | Re: Rolling ball clock revisited
|
|
"David Eaton" <deaton@intdata.com> wrote in message news:I8DHDr.u1s@lugnet.com... (...) Not exactly what I was thinking, but you're close. If you stick your bendy straw in your 1/2 pint chocolate milk and then turn it upside-down, that's more of (...) (20 years ago, 7-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Rolling ball clock revisited
|
|
Hi Rob, (...) I tried a similar mechanism (a large inclined plane with a width reduction in the end), the problem is that LEGO balls are somewhat rough, and they tend to form a locked arch above width shrinking. I even tried to add a stirring (...) (20 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | The Great Ball Contraption (was Re: Rolling ball clock revisited)
|
|
(...) This announcement isn't quite ready, but while we're on the subject of rolling [soccer] balls, I figured I'd leak out a bit of info. We're working on a standard (currently in testing) for modules for "The Great Ball Contraption." Think Rube (...) (20 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: The Great Ball Contraption (was Re: Rolling ball clock revisited)
|
|
(...) One thing Steve forgot - think constant noise. Constant, *constant* noise. But it is a lot of fun... (20 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: The Great Ball Contraption (was Re: Rolling ball clock revisited)
|
|
(...) Looks fun ;o) One of my goals when building Bob's clock was to get my feet wet in ball moving... One foreseeable issue: if an upstream unit has more throughput than a downstream one, we shall get ball overflows! Philo (20 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: The Great Ball Contraption (was Re: Rolling ball clock revisited)
|
|
(...) There will be a minimum throuhgput to solve that. Right now, we're testing with 1 ball/second. So, the very first module will be regulated to run somewhere just below that speed. As long as everyone else can meet the minimum, there will be no (...) (20 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
