|
|
 | | Whining about studless parts - Was: Pneumatics book?
|
| (...) Can you really blame this on studless parts, given that many others *have* made worthwhile designs? Perhaps your prejudice against studless parts is preventing you from creating a worthwhile design. I have made a few worthwhile (IMHO) designs (...) (21 years ago, 10-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Whining about studless parts: was Pneumatics book?
|
| (...) (21 years ago, 10-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.books)
| | | | | Re: pneumatic cylinder: why not hydraulic ??
|
| (...) Cool, I look forward to it. I ended up adding two 1x4's per leg on my hexapod. They fit nicely. It looks very burly with all those switches though. All the structure and pneumatic parts are there, except hoses and T's. Hooking up all the hoses (...) (21 years ago, 10-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: Pneumatics book?
|
| (...) Has anyone noticed all of the rich variety of parts available to the modern stud-free system that have no comparable equivalent in the old stud-dependant system? Take, for instance, these parts: (URL) triple liftarm> (URL) 1x2 flat liftarm> (...) (21 years ago, 10-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.books, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Pneumatics book?
|
| (...) Sorry for replying to my own post but I've just had another thought. Has anyone else noticed all the ancillary junk needed to build a studless creation? Compare it with the basic studded version, all you have is beams, of varying lengths, 1xn (...) (21 years ago, 10-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.books)
|
|
