 | | Re: Studless Technic models —Allan Bedford
|
| | | (...) Jindrich, I also understand both sides of the argument. I see uses for both types of pieces, so I'm not hard core in either direction. (...) Also, I hope you understood my question about what it was you were concerned about. I just wanted to (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Studless Technic models —Jindrich Kubec
|
| | | | (...) Yes. (...) I should have written 'the studless beams'. (...) Of course, I'm not against the studless beams. I'm against replacement of studded beams with studless in new Technic sets, rendering them incompatible with System. Technic (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Studless Technic models —Allan Bedford
|
| | | | (...) Cool. :) It just makes sure we're all on the same page. (...) Actually it was specifically the words, "right to live" that seemed to indicate you felt these parts were dead, gone, deleted, discontinued etc. etc. Once again, this was why I (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Studless Technic models —Jindrich Kubec
|
| | | | (...) Don't catch my on my every word, please, I'm not a native speaker so expressing some subtle feelings and so are rather hard for me ;-) I just think of studded beams/holed plates as a 'compatibility layer' between System and Technic. My old 744 (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Studless Technic models —Allan Bedford
|
| | | | (...) I speak only one language, so please don't feel I'm in any way attempting to pick apart your English postings. In fact, I am quite sincerely just trying to make sure that I understand exactly what it is that you are trying to express. It's (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
