 | | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
hi philo it's a pitty it could be elegant solution :) of course you checked liftarm's axlehole :) ie 1x2 liftarm pixel "Philippe Hurbain" <philohome@free.fr> wrote in message news:Hq1sxr.16Jo@lugnet.com... (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
(...) Of course if you could use the thin liftarm it would be better, but I think the wide liftarm is also an elegant solution :) ROSCO (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
"Ross Crawford" <rosscraw@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message news:Hq36E4.1q4v@lugnet.com... (...) no doubt it is i thought thin liftarm with piston vents inside axleholes could join pistons better (stronger) but wide liftarm is a very good solution (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Connecting New Cylinders
|
|
(...) I think I'd be worried that bending forces when operating the cylinders could cause the thin liftarm to snap the inlet. At least with the wide liftarm, the forces would be carried by a substantially larger area, and with the hose also (...) (21 years ago, 18-Dec-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
