 | | Re: New style diffs, driving rings and 16t clutch gears
|
|
"Ross Crawford" <rcrawford@csi.com> wrote in message news:H05y29.8wr@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) Has someone not made a locking diff with this? Jennifer (23 years ago, 1-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Motors in parallel and stuff...
|
|
"Thomas Avery" <thomas.avery@intec-hou.com> wrote in message news:H057q6.Mrp@lugnet.com... extra motors? (...) into (...) I think the small 9V battery box is ok with one motor, but you can really see the difference with two or more motors under (...) (23 years ago, 1-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New style diffs, driving rings and 16t clutch gears
|
|
(...) Well spotted! (...) Not that I know of... (...) The obvious one I can see is different gear ratio (using the 24t gear on the diff). Means you can get a really simple 2-speed trans without external gearing (like most of TLC's multi-speed (...) (23 years ago, 1-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | New style diffs, driving rings and 16t clutch gears
|
|
Hi, Has anybody else noticed that the new style Technic differential housings (p/n 6573) have the same mouldings as the 16t clutch gears and could therefore be engaged by a driving ring. Has Lego ever used this feature in a set? Can anyone think of (...) (23 years ago, 1-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Motors in parallel and stuff...
|
|
(...) I'm thinking that the most efficient thing is to use one motor for each axle. That will save you the universal joints, and it will also impose less friction on the drive train. The solution isn't that technically interesting, but if efficiency (...) (23 years ago, 1-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
