|
|
 | | Re: John Deere JD690-B backhoe
|
| Looks very good! I like the job you did on the bucket. It looks very real. Amazing what you have done at that small scale. You really need a "macro mode" on that camera. The pictures don't do justice to your work. I hope you will post the final (...) (22 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.town, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | John Deere JD690-B backhoe
|
| This one, like my CAT 980G, is almost done, it is minus a good bucket, tracks for one side (which are supposedly in the mail!), & a few plates (also coming). I liked the cab design on it, which inabled me to use up one of those windows! It uses (...) (22 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.town, lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: MoTeC rule question.
|
| (...) There were personal e-mails between me and Tobbe. In an e-mail to me, Tobbe tells me, I have been found breaking the rules. He also goes on to say how he does not know a punishment, and he will ask the group. My understanding, from his (...) (22 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: MoTeC rule question.
|
| In lugnet.technic, Brian Sadowski writes: [Additional stuff added from Tobbe's post] (...) [snip] (...) I agree, and I don't see any problem specifically allowing non-LEGO elements such as yours in future MoTeCs, however the current rules (as (...) (22 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Sorry for Double Post
|
| Opps, sorry, I did not mean to double post that (22 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: MoTeC rule question.
|
| (...) Nope, and I'll tell you why. It is my MOC which is subject to debate. In my shrimp rover, on one of the wheels I used the non-lego parts which are in question. Here is the picture: (URL) is the MOC: (URL) you can clearly see the two plastic (...) (22 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: MoTeC rule question.
|
| (...) Nope, and I'll tell you why. It is my MOC which is subject to debate. In my shrimp rover, on one of the wheels I used the non-lego parts which are in question. Here is the picture: (URL) is the MOC: (URL) you can clearly see the two plastic (...) (22 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: MoTeC rule question.
|
| <<snip>> (...) <<snip>> Hi, once more I manage to grow a big thread in lugnet.technic. I've read 'em all up to now and it looks like the "Yes"-side is bigger then the "No"-side. Still, I feel I don't want to let the modified and "pure" MOC's fight (...) (22 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: Black, Grey and Yellow trials motor bike -- Help wanted
|
| Sounds like you purchased the 8838. Is this a match with the Brickshelf scan? (URL) this helps, Adrian Egli "Keith Fishlock" <raider__man@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Gvx19u.7wz@lugnet.com... (...) to (...) (22 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Black, Grey and Yellow trials motor bike -- Help wanted
|
| Can anyone help me - I recently purchased a Technic Black, Grey and Yellow Trials motor bike with white spoked wheels, spring suspension front and back, 2 moving cylinders driven by a black chain. The problem is that I can't get any building (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
