To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / *9356 (-10)
  Re: MoTeC rule question.
 
Check me out preaching Purity! And I never even entered the Contest! (chants ~Mech~ quietly) Legomaster (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: MoTeC rule question.
 
Tobbe, Keep it Pure! That is part of the Challange! Finding ways to work with the short commings is part of building. True the worm gears have a significant amount of backlash, but using wormgears without another means to soak up the slack needs (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: MoTeC rule question.
 
(...) I've never had any problems. (...) I think if we follow this route we should split the competiton into two catagories. Keep the current rules and add a parallel class for models containing modified parts. I realise this would create more (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Technic/Mindstorms™ at BrickFest 2002
 
(...) I wonder how high the ceilings are there? He-he ;-) TJ (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: MoTeC rule question.
 
(...) I think small modifications should be allowed, as long as the finished model is 99% pure Lego. In the end, it should all be up to the voters. If they don't like modified Lego parts, or non-Lego parts, in the models then they will not vote for (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: MoTeC rule question.
 
(...) I see no reason why not. Of course *I'd* never use such modifications o8?) ROSCO (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: An OrthoGlide Mill
 
"Bob Fay" <rfay@attbi.com> wrote in message news:GvoyrL.G8x@lugnet.com... (...) You put a lot of work into it, and have a great result! Iain (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: MoTeC rule question.
 
I certainly think it should be allowed. -Brian (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: MoTeC rule question.
 
No!!!! :( SRL (...) <<<<< (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: MoTeC rule question.
 
Yes!!!! :) JB (...) <<<<< (22 years ago, 6-May-02, to lugnet.technic)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR