To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / *8981 (-20)
  How real should it be?
 
Hi! I constantly forget that LEGO, after all, is a toy and get disappointed when I can't get the realism of real world applications done with LEGO. It's most often the pneumatics that have too short stroke and/or streanght. The motion envelope get's (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  MoTeC needs more competitors!
 
FUT lugnet.technic Hi! I realize it's not much time left with all the competitions currently running but I'd still like to see more then two entries fro this months MoTeC (Monthly Technic Creation)! I'll add one myself so it's three but I bet you (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.modelteam, lugnet.build.contests)
 
  Need Instruction Scans - Trike Buggy (set 1257 or 3000)
 
Been doing a little hobby project of making as many Technic motorcycles as I have parts for. One that I do not own but am trying to recreate from the box (bag?) artwork/pic is the Trike Buggy, set #1257 (or #3000 as the Kabaya Promotional Set: Trike (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  New MOCs, some entries for the TOWN Contest
 
I've been pretty busy lately. The following represents about two months of work and it's all stuff I built for the recent TEXLUG meeting. For the 2002 TOWN contest: D Large buildings (URL) Row Buildings 3 small connected office buildings. N Bridges (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.town, lugnet.trains, lugnet.technic, lugnet.org.us.texlug) ! 
 
  New entries in Lego Contest.
 
I just built a small 4-wheel drive vehicle. It weighs a mere 12 ounces and it lifted 14 1/2 ounces. That's 120% of it's own weight. I more than doubled my original lift from my first vehicle I built. So dust off those creations and hook up the juice (...) (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: New Lego Contest for Technic Builders.
 
Don't you have any heavier classes? (...) (23 years ago, 17-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Happy St Patrick's Day Matoran
 
Low bandwidth (URL) (but why, really?): (URL) (23 years ago, 17-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
 
  Re: Spectrum as source of Technic Spares
 
"Ralph Hempel" <rhempel@bmts.com> wrote in message news:CAEBIOGHPFFJALB...mts.com... (...) (URL) mpSearchCode=SP> (...) ummm, is that US funds or Canadian cause if it's Canadian then those prices are really cheap. my 0.02USD mike "new job" fusion (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
 
  Re: Truss Joint Construction Details
 
(...) Well of course! I'm not that crazy ;-) (...) They're my wife's weights, but believe me, if you lift those things a hundred times they do get pretty heavy :-) TJ (23 years ago, 17-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: New Lego Contest for Technic Builders.
 
(...) Interesting! Do you think you could include metric values as well? 1 lb = ~0.453592 kg 1 oz = ~0.028350 kg I can work the math myself but it would be far more easy to have the metric values handy at the page :) I have to see if I have them (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Truss Joint Construction Details
 
(...) nice and did not drop them at all. BTW what do you use those weights for anyway? I can't see any muscular overload with that amount of weight .) (...) Yes, they exist but I don't think they are that many. I might be wrong though :) I feel they (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Bi*nicle folks went away?
 
I can't really disagree with your points. (...) True enough. (...) That's subjective, but it certainly is oversimplified kiddie-cartoon quality. (...) You probably just wish they'd spend that much effort promoting the other sets. It does make you (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  New Lego Contest for Technic Builders.
 
I created a Lego contest for Technic builders that I hope you will take part in. Visit my website at (URL) for details. (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Bi*nicle folks went away?
 
(...) background of .technic?! I sure have. To tell you the truth though, I absolutely hate bionicle. Why? Here's a few of my reasons as to why Bionicle is the bane of bricks... (1) Over-done specialty parts that have not pareticular use outside of (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Bi*nicle folks went away?
 
(...) I agree with Mike Edwards that most of the traffic has moved over to BZCommunity.com. And why wouldn't it? It seems like the very mention of Bionicle here on LUGNET prompts overkill threads like this. :) I manage online communities for a (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Lego Constructopedia
 
(...) The animations are nifty. I look forward to more entries. (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Lego Constructopedia
 
I don't know if this has been mentioned before, but Lego has an online constructopedia: (URL) added a link to this on the Technic newsgroup sidebar. TJ (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Bionicle folks went away?
 
(...) And a "Dark Age" will begin for many :< Ron (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
 
  Re: Bi*nicle folks went away?
 
(...) the biggest single Bionicle discussion wasn't about Bionicle dierctly but about the avatars on Brickshelf. A regrettably polarizing situation that was resolved nicely by the various admins. - Kyle (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Bi*nicle folks went away?
 
(...) Stipulated! I thought the fact of your response to the challenge was acceptance enough. :) I'm thinking of giving it a go myself, but I'm afraid the existence of such a massively recursive Technic model may open a rift in the time/space (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR