To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / *7401 (-5)
  Re: Bulk Sets (was: Re: How about "Technic Tubs" ?)
 
(...) Didn't you read the part in parentheses? --Bill. (23 years ago, 13-Oct-01, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Bulk Sets (was: Re: How about "Technic Tubs" ?)
 
(...) I've heard that too, but I suspect they are just talking about production costs. ABS is cheap, and there's no retooling needed to make basic bricks. So from that end it is certainly profitable. But when you include the distribution costs, I'm (...) (23 years ago, 13-Oct-01, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Updates in online game
 
Hehe... I figured out my problem... in addition to Le Koro randomly resetting depending on what side of the cave I entered on, I hadn't yet found the golden Hau. Finding that fixed my whole problem quite easily. (...) (23 years ago, 12-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
 
  Re: Bulk Sets (was: Re: How about "Technic Tubs" ?)
 
(...) I doubt anything LEGO makes, now or at any time in the past, could be classified a loss leader. There is not $19.99 worth of raw materials and packaging in that tub. (...) I think an argument could be made that it might also be a staple for (...) (23 years ago, 13-Oct-01, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Bulk Sets (was: Re: How about "Technic Tubs" ?)
 
(...) Lego has stated that 3033 is NOT a loss leader. (meaning it's profitable). (23 years ago, 12-Oct-01, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR