 | | Re: scanning for new parts
|
|
(...) That is a very nice idea...it would really help to know exactly what you're buying. People would not be forced to find a parts inventory list or head for Brickshelf to see what elements the set comes with. Looks like the 8465 and 8466 will (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC Contest
|
|
It has been two Weeks Since Someone sent me a MOC Entrie, I need another One. (24 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Comment about Bionickle Colors
|
|
Hey Y'all: Okay, so once I finally saw one of these Bionickle cannisters cracked open and strewn about the shelf of a local store I got curious to own one. Some of the parts did actually look interesting in terms of expanding my teeny collection of (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Re: scanning for new parts
|
|
What I would like Lego to do is make more pictures and descriptions available. How much would it cost them to post a few more pictures of 8466 (and others, too) on the Net or simply put more text descriptions? We could get a better look at the beast (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: scanning for new parts
|
|
You're right, it does look like the 32186 of the 8448! When I look closely at the main photo, I can see some bevel gears, but it's not clear enough if they are within a diff housing above a 16 tooth gear and did something like what was done to the (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: RIS 2.0
|
|
I checked the site again this morning and for the US it says available. The box has RIS 2.0 in large letters with small pictures of four robots. The Spring catalog ad for the RIS 2.0 mentions new advanced programming software (I assume this is the (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: scanning for new parts
|
|
(...) I was looking at the front suspension of the new 4x4 set, 8466. It's supposed to be full 4-wheel drive so the front wheels must be driven and steerable. In the catalog, I can see a yellow piece that looks like: (URL) number: 32186 Is it this (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Civil Engineer letter
|
|
(...) That's great, Simon! I hope all of our comments and input were constructive enough. Your final revision of the letter was not too long, hit some very important points, and certainly made a good argument that Lego is a better "building system". (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | scanning for new parts
|
|
I received the new S@H catalog the other day, and, as usual, browsed the photos of all the new stuff looking for evidence of new parts - especially ones with a Technic bias/use. I am intrigued by the photo of 8538. First of all, there is an (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: New Civil Engineer letter
|
|
(...) Crikey ROSCO, all I did was write a letter, you built the bridge! Psi (24 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
