 | | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) But it's not that simple. LEGO's marketing and development as of late isn't simply a new avenue of exploration, but rather an abandonment of their ideals. It would be like if Caddilac started manufacturing riding lawn mowers, cut back (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | RE: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) For $99, you can buy an 8x4 foot roller coaster or a 5 foot tall Rube Goldbergian ball machine. (I have both, and they're both quite cool) K'Nex definitely has it's pros, especially for large constructions. And the parts are even more of a (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | RE: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) Check out (URL). This is an Australian company that has built a sizeable market in providing science workshops to school children using, among other things, K'NEX Sure, they might have tried LEGO, but they way kids in classrooms treat any (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) I always thought ZNAP was Lego's answear to K'nex (spit!), which is probably why it failed, nobody want's either. Of course K'nex is a huge failure, shame the people who make it (and the people who buy it) haven't realised that yet! :-). Steve (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | RE: Call me a Lego pureist if you will but...
|
|
(...) I think ZNAP was an exciting departure for Lego. I am only sorry to see it effectively withdrawn before it had a chance. And I hope, like Ralph appears to, that it may not have been the end. If you compare todays ZNAP parts with original Lego (...) (24 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
