 | | Re: Truck MOC
|
|
(...) Hi Erik! That's a very good looking truck so don't get fooled by the non-existing responses on this one. It merely ended up in the wrong group :) I'm cross-posting this to town since it's a minifig scaled truck without any Technic functions (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: Technica
|
|
Okay so I am a little late in the reply but: YAY! Thank you! (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) They were perhaps a bit fragile but not that fragile. Here's another version still in production: (URL) Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) (remove SPAM when e-mailing) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) Just to clarify; I thought SNOT was more about turning BASIC bricks on other edges then Studs on top (hence SNOT - Studs Not On Top). By turning parts around it creates different offsets etc.. See Bram's BMW as an example of offset building: (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) In fact the RCX *does* have pin holes. Only four of them, but they are there. Two half pin holes on each side. [snip] I guess I'm not the only one who was lots of energy about the studless beam bashing. Kevin (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) than two reissued sets, they were pretty much discontinued in 1997, and with good reason. They have fringed ends, which have proven to be very prone to breaking, if I'm not mistaken. Especially when the fringed ends are attached to studs. And (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) Personally I'm happy that they have the studless beams, however, I also hope that they keep having the "old" style stud beams. I tend to stick more to robotics (Mindstorms), my recent trebuchet was a rare deviation away from robotics (it was (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) Ahem (URL) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) This: (URL) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Studless Technic models
|
|
(...) Exactly. And the more reinforcements you have to add, the more _extra_ pieces it requires. To my mind, that's no different than requiring a similar number of extra pieces in instances where you desire full System compatibility. (...) Both (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
