 | | Re: Food for MechCat
|
|
(...) Sorry Kevin, I moved things around in my Brickshelf galleries in preparation to putting the instructions on the BI portal. The new locations (after moderation) are: Bird : (URL) : (URL) : (URL) hope people have as much fun building them as I (...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: More Speeds in 8448/8466 Gearbox?
|
|
(...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Food for MechCat
|
|
Dean, I'm very interested in looking at your biped bird, but the links don't work. Kevin (...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Helicopter rotor in 8856... unrealistic?
|
|
(...) Yep, but 852 only has collective control, and relies on gravity! Ben's has limited cyclic control (nose up/down), and no collective, but that's just a limitation imposed by the original 8444 model - full collective and cyclic could be done (...) (22 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Helicopter rotor in 8856... unrealistic?
|
|
(...) The rotor design in that set isn't quite right either, though its closer to real life. In the 852, the control stick changes the pitch of the rotor blades, but the pitch angle stays the same as the blades spin around the hub. In a real (...) (22 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Helicopter rotor in 8856... unrealistic?
|
|
(...) It has already been made by Lego in 1977, 852 Reconnoitre Helicopter. Wonder why they did not do that later on also? /Pehter (22 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Helicopter rotor in 8856... unrealistic?
|
|
(...) move forwards backwards or sideways. If you tilt the rotor (as is done in these sets) the only thing that happens is that the fusalage of the helecoptor tilts. In a real helecoptor the blades's pitch varies as it rotates around the hub. The (...) (22 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Heavily modified 8880 chassis, succesfully motorised and solar powered.
|
|
(...) If I want to keep all the features (4wd, gearbox, suspension), which I do, the chassis can't be very much lighter than it is now. Besides, that's just not the direction I want to go. Thing is, I really want to use a better motor. The lego (...) (22 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Moc: Digger
|
|
(...) Thanks. I wish I had the 851/952 tractor to pull, would have been more right in style. The 8859 has to much of an modern tractor to look right. /Pehter (22 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.loc.se)
|
| |
| | Re: Heavily modified 8880 chassis, succesfully motorised and solar powered.
|
|
"Gillish" <gillish@wanadoo.nl> wrote in message news:HA920E.E7y@lugnet.com... The lego motor is thinking of going on a strike or even dying (...) heavily. (...) I think it is time to consider a lighter chassis. Your project is getting rather (...) (22 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
