Subject:
|
Re: New TIEs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Wed, 22 Nov 2000 05:40:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
742 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Eric Joslin writes:
> > The reason the original Star Trek series didn't have small craft was that
> > they didn't want to seem derivative of Star Wars. 8^)
>
> Huh?
>
> The original Star Drek series in the 60's didn't want to seem derivative of a
> movie that came out in 1977?
I was hoping the 8^) would reveal the fact that I was kidding, but apparently
it failed. Anyway, I can't talk to you now that I know you're part of that
whole "Eric" conspiracy, if you even really exist...
Dave!
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: New TIEs
|
| (...) But.... logic circuits... overloading... aigh! (...) Hmmm. You will be assimilated. eric (24 years ago, 22-Nov-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | Re: New TIEs
|
| (...) Ahhh... It is you that does not exist. Only the Eric's exist the rest of you are all just figments of our collective imaginations. Followups to off-topic.fun Eric Kingsley (24 years ago, 22-Nov-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New TIEs
|
| (...) Huh? The original Star Drek series in the 60's didn't want to seem derivative of a movie that came out in 1977? Weird. Maybe when fans of Roddenberry say he had a unique vision of the future, they mean it. eric (24 years ago, 21-Nov-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
31 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
