 | | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion —Andrew Hood
|
| | | Knowing me, I'd probably buy it if I could, but I'd end up dismantling it like I did the Tie/advanced and one of my B-wings. It looks like a better resource for good minifigs and large grey pieces if you ask me. (25 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion —James Walker
|
| | | | | (...) i agree it is the only set that i know that has c3po and leia... and i think that lego did the best that they could... would any of you buy an enhanced better bigger more accurate one for more than double the price? -James Walker (25 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion —Chris Maddison
|
| | | | | | | (...) Umm, yes. A UCS MF would be horrible expensive, but I'm guessing it'd be over 2500-3000 pieces. That's a lot. -Chris (25 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion —Eric Joslin
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Of course there are people here who would buy it. The real question is, are there *enough* people in the world at large to make it worth designing, marketing, soliciting, producing, and shipping? Probably not. Anyone who is disappointed with (...) (25 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | | I'd buy a UCS MF and pay up to $500 as long as it was done RIGHT. (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion —James Simpson
|
| | | | | | (...) TLC wouldn't have needed to double the price to produce a more accurate Falcon - they could have done so with a more accurate and judicious selection of pieces. I realize that the MF is a hot item, so TLC is going to make it an expensive set, (...) (25 years ago, 16-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion —Andrew Tyrone
|
| | | | (...) And where's Obi-Wan? I could have sworn he was on it. =P -- Agent 0007 AIM: Agent O0O7 (25 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | (...) I hate to tell you this, but obi wan died during the fight on the death star, therefore he isnt on the falcon in this case. (25 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion —Greg Majewski
|
| | | | (...) like I (...) resource for (...) Hey, good idea, except how do you know that the set isn't going *to* the Death Star :) Ah well, you can get (old) Obi-Wan's in a relatively cheap set, so I wouldn't be worrying. And another thing, Obi Wan didn't (...) (25 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | (...) leia, it would have obi wan instead. (25 years ago, 14-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion —Aaron West
|
| | | | (...) it (...) Death (...) island (...) How do you know it is not an inflatable Leia? "It's not my nose, it's a false one," MPFC: Holy Grail Aaron (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Millennium Falcon Opinion —Greg Majewski
|
| | | | (...) Hmm... Why would R2D2 have need for an inflatable Leia? If anyone had a reason to have one, that would be R4D5, but he isn't included with the set. Or maybe that isn't the case... Ol' Obi-Wan is probably just doing some of his cross dressing (...) (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
