Subject:
|
Re: Imperial Droids
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 May 2000 03:18:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
567 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Mark Sandlin writes:
> In lugnet.starwars, Aaron West writes:
> > In lugnet.starwars, Mark Sandlin writes:
> > > Back in the old days, he was called "Death Star Droid." There's also • the
> > > venerable mouse droid (berr berr bupbup)
> > >
> > > See this page for pics of the new action figs.
> > >
> > > http://www.toymania.com/news/swnew7_98.shtml
> > >
> > > ~Mark
> >
> > You know, those figures are not new. They are at least a year and a half • old,
> > and not in production any more.
>
> They are "new" compared to the 20 + year-old version that used to inhabit
> my toybox as a lad.
>
>
> > Also they are not LEGO products, and don't have anything to do with • LEGO.
> > They are Hasbro action figures. Does this really belong on a LEGO fan • site as
> > a main topic? I am trying not to be nit-picky, but it kind of derails
> > discussion groups IMHO. You might want to relocate these questions • to a Star
> > Wars Action figure fan site (such as rebelscum, or yakface's realm), if • you
> > want more responses.
> > Happy building,
> > Aaron
>
> Ease down.
>
> It's called a "picture reference." Some of us use them as a _reference_
> for building our own LEGO creations or custom minifigs. I often visit
> NON-LEGO (gasp!) websites to get pics for things I want to build. In that
> sense, it's certainly relevant. If you don't personally find it relevant then
> just move on to the next post.
>
> Sheesh.
>
> ~Mark
Lordy, lordy, lordy.
I feel like my head was bit off like a Tootsie Pop. I repeat, perhaps my
message was misunderstood, and I am sorry to ruffle so many feathers. I was
(if you care) trying to be helpful and was perhaps a little to vaguely obvious
(?). Forgive a worn out brain for the inability to get a point clearly
accros. Don't expend so much energy over lynching me yet, I hardly asked for
it. I only wanted to suggest that other collector web sites may have more
trading partners than those of us who spend most of our disposable cash on
other forms of plastic playthings. And they are probably easy enough to call
old when they are out of production, distribution and were not readily
available for purchase from retail anywho. Really, I forgot that there has
not been a good fight here on lugnet for a looonnng time now, I should have
known better.
Repectfully,
Aaron
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Imperial Droids
|
| (...) I'm sorry. Perhaps I was a bit short yesterday. I certainly didn't mean to bite your head off (although tootsie pops are delicious- well, except for the orange ones, orange and chocolate are just plain nasty together). My main point was merely (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | Re: Imperial Droids
|
| (...) feathers. I was (...) obvious (...) asked for (...) more (...) cash on (...) call (...) have (...) Ah,shucks, it's ok. I probably responded a bit roughly, but I really hate it when someone who isn't site admin tries to be an "Off-Topic Nazi." (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Imperial Droids
|
| (...) the (...) old, (...) They are "new" compared to the 20 + year-old version that used to inhabit my toybox as a lad. (...) LEGO. (...) site as (...) to a Star (...) you (...) Ease down. It's called a "picture reference." Some of us use them as a (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
