Subject:
|
Re: Who's got the Y-wing?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Mon, 8 Mar 1999 23:07:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
997 times
|
| |
|
|
>
> OK. Sorry if I was curt, terse, or too vague. I occasionally misjudge
> what messages need smileys, and in which the intent is clear without the
> help.
>
> John has been going on about wanting to find out the length of the
> extension rods in the Y-Wing for some time, so I was needling him a
> little bit.
And if a less-familiar name was attached to the post, it probably would have
worked, too. I was just about to hit the "reply" button when I saw it was
you.
And about "going on" about the length, I guess I figured that if someone had
posted a mini-review of the Tie Fighter, they must have the Y-wing and be
able to tell me the length, but I guess not. Since I didn't know if the
reviewer was Ldraw-conversant, I tried to be more descriptive than the
Technic Link 16L, which would confuse just about anyone.
I'm still suprised that the 16L part was used here. When I put them on my
Ldraw Y-wing, they looked way too long. Perhaps a problem of Ldraw
perspective?
-John Van
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Who's got the Y-wing?
|
| (...) That makes sense. (...) I just double-checked. The axle-links are still the same length as a 16L beam. They do stick out, but those 3x3x2 cones on the back of the nacelles help balance things out a bit. Steve (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Who's got the Y-wing?
|
| (...) OK. Sorry if I was curt, terse, or too vague. I occasionally misjudge what messages need smileys, and in which the intent is clear without the help. John has been going on about wanting to find out the length of the extension rods in the (...) (26 years ago, 8-Mar-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
