Subject:
|
Re: Who's got the Y-wing?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Mar 1999 15:24:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1108 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999 23:07:42 GMT, "John VanZwieten"
<john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com> wrote:
> And about "going on" about the length, I guess I figured that if someone had
> posted a mini-review of the Tie Fighter, they must have the Y-wing and be
> able to tell me the length, but I guess not. Since I didn't know if the
> reviewer was Ldraw-conversant, I tried to be more descriptive than the
> Technic Link 16L, which would confuse just about anyone.
That makes sense.
> I'm still suprised that the 16L part was used here. When I put them on my
> Ldraw Y-wing, they looked way too long. Perhaps a problem of Ldraw
> perspective?
I just double-checked. The axle-links are still the same length as a
16L beam. They do stick out, but those 3x3x2 cones on the back of the
nacelles help balance things out a bit.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Who's got the Y-wing?
|
| (...) And if a less-familiar name was attached to the post, it probably would have worked, too. I was just about to hit the "reply" button when I saw it was you. And about "going on" about the length, I guess I figured that if someone had posted a (...) (26 years ago, 8-Mar-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
