 | | Re: Some questions —Mark Sandlin
| | | | In lugnet.starwars, Adam Murtha writes: <snip> (...) the (...) are: (...) </snip> I think you're correct on the Infiltrator, Slave I, and the B-wing. The Speeder Bikes are pretty close, if a bit large, but you can MOC them and correct that. The (...) (25 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Some questions —Adam Murtha
| | | | | Mark, you'll have to excuse my ignorance, but what is MOC? It also sounds like to me that you think the X-Wing is too small. Did TLG get any close? I think the Y-Wing is fairly accurate as is the snowspeeder. I would have to say that the Naboo (...) (25 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Some questions —Todd Lehman
| | | | | | (...) Multi Orbital Craft. errr, no... Memory Object Compiler... wait... Micro Optical Circuit...? no, that's not it either...darn it... Mail Object Converter...!? hmm, no. argh. Most Optimal Configuration! wait, that's not it either. hrmm. (...) (25 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Some questions —Mark Sandlin
| | | | | (...) My Own Creation (...) Well, it is, but that wasn't what I was trying to point out. I was trying to say that most parents are more concerned with "how much toy am I getting for my money?" If you have two X-wing toys that cost the same, I think (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Some questions —Derek Schin
| | | | | Mark Sandlin wrote in message ... (...) to say (...) Well, precise scale, no, but some are very close. For example, the X-Wing, Y-Wing, Snowspeeder and Luke's Landspeeder are all within a couple of studs of scale--which is actually fairly (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | | |
