Subject:
|
Re: Scale?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 02:19:35 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@^Spamless^mattdm.org
|
Viewed:
|
743 times
|
| |
|
|
John J. Ladasky Jr. <ladasky@my-deja.com> wrote:
> translates between human size and minifig size, 3.5 stude per foot is
> clearly wrong. Minifig scale is about 0.35 meters per stud -- or, in
> Imperial measurements, 13.8 inches per stud.
Is that lengthwise or heightwise?
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Scale?
|
| (...) Huh? That question is a little vague. I'll try to be more specific. Lay a minifig down on its back. You will see that it's five studs high. An average adult human is about 1.7 meters (or 5 feet, 7 inches) tall. Divide 1.7 meters by 5 studs, (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Scale?
|
| (...) It depends what you mean by "scale." If you mean a scale that translates between human size and minifig size, 3.5 stude per foot is clearly wrong. Minifig scale is about 0.35 meters per stud -- or, in Imperial measurements, 13.8 inches per (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
