Subject:
|
Re: Scale?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 02:00:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
521 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
"Tim Saupé" wrote:
>
> I think I heard someone once say that a good guide for scale is 3.5
> studs per foot. Is that right?
>
> Ti
It depends what you mean by "scale." If you mean a scale that
translates between human size and minifig size, 3.5 stude per foot is
clearly wrong. Minifig scale is about 0.35 meters per stud -- or, in
Imperial measurements, 13.8 inches per stud.
--
John J. Ladasky Jr., Ph.D.
Department of Structural Biology
Stanford University Medical Center
Stanford, CA 94305
Secretary, Californians for Renewable Energy <http://www.calfree.com>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Scale?
|
| I think I heard someone once say that a good guide for scale is 3.5 studs per foot. Is that right? Ti (24 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
9 Messages in This Thread: ![Scale? -Tim Saupé (5-Jan-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Scale? -Bram Lambrecht (5-Jan-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Scale? -James Brown (6-Jan-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Scale? -Ed T. Toton III (5-Jan-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Scale? -Matthew Miller (6-Jan-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Scale? -John J. Ladasky, Jr. (6-Jan-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Scale? -Matthew Miller (6-Jan-00 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Scale? -John J. Ladasky, Jr. (6-Jan-00 to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|