 | | Re: Anyone get Lego for XMAS? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | (...) Just a nitpick, here: why do so many people assert that this is an incorrect spelling? I expect, Simon, you're being at least partially facetious, but I've seen people being real sticks-in-the-mud about it. Regardless of the "real" spelling of (...) (25 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Anyone get Lego for XMAS? —James Brown
|
| | | | (...) hards always claim, it isn't worth my time to check. The movies are more canon than the website. Personally, I don't care. (Nor, I suspect does George) James (URL) (25 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Anyone get Lego for XMAS? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) That's my view, too. I'm not bothered by the spelling nearly so much as by the people who make a big deal about it (even bigger, that is, than the deal I've made about it!). Dave! (25 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Anyone get Lego for XMAS? —Christian Gemuenden
|
| | | | Over here in Germany we simply say " Lichtschwert" and there is no discussion. So if you need a better word instead take this one :) ! Bye, Christian. Dave Schuler <orrex@excite.com> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag: FnKp80.7Mu@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Anyone get Lego for XMAS? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) Perfect! I'll use it! Dave! (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Anyone get Lego for XMAS? —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) <spaceballs> "I see your lichtschwert is as big as mine." Actually, it sounds like a candy that way. </spaceballs> LFB (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
