Subject:
|
Re: Reason for no stormtroopers
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 Dec 1999 01:18:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
336 times
|
| |
|
|
Jonathan Wilson wrote in message <38505468.DECD3DB1@xoommail.com>...
> Yes but those are not "guns" as such, they are just a few parts put • together
> to represent a gun.
What indication do you have that they would be required to mold "special"
guns for Stormtroopers? If this was a requirement, we would have seen them
already. When the Stormtroopers come out, their guns will probably be made
the same way.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Reason for no stormtroopers
|
| (...) Let me see if I can clear this up a little, I think what Jon is saying is that it would be nice to see TLC make an actual storm Trooper Baster, rather than rigging up some megaphone or whatever. Scott S. (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | Re: Reason for no stormtroopers
|
| (...) The Hoth Rebel soldier already has a blaster rifle. They used the old Space camera/gun/whatever piece. I don't see why they couldn't/wouldn't do the same for the Stormtroopers... J (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Reason for no stormtroopers
|
| (...) Yes but those are not "guns" as such, they are just a few parts put together to represent a gun. a blaster would have to look like a gun. I even read that the blasters were based on a real gun. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
