Subject:
|
Re: Reason for no stormtroopers
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 Dec 1999 01:16:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
443 times
|
| |
|
|
D Garcia wrote:
> Jonathan Wilson wrote in message <385039D1.90EBFC1D@xoommail.com>...
> > Here are my thoughts on the reason for no storm troopers.
> > Blasters
>
> And the STAP Troopers? They come with blasters that have a trans orange
> cone for the "laser" being shot out of them.
Yes but those are not "guns" as such, they are just a few parts put together
to represent a gun. a blaster would have to look like a gun. I even read
that the blasters were based on a real gun.
--
Jonathan Wilson
wilsonj@xoommail.com
http://members.xoom.com/wilsonj/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Reason for no stormtroopers
|
| Jonathan Wilson wrote in message <38505468.DECD3DB1@x...il.com>... (...) together (...) What indication do you have that they would be required to mold "special" guns for Stormtroopers? If this was a requirement, we would have seen them already. (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Reason for no stormtroopers
|
| Jonathan Wilson wrote in message <385039D1.90EBFC1D@x...il.com>... (...) And the STAP Troopers? They come with blasters that have a trans orange cone for the "laser" being shot out of them. (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
