To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 4319
  Re: Bigger/better scans of 2000 sets?
 
(...) You mean the MTT? There isn't a catalog picture yet, just the pic from www.theouterrim.com. In that piture, I can make out the following: Red A-Wing Canopies (2-4), red TIE dome, black 3x6x2.3 cylinder, and 2x2x3 corner slopes (beige? white?). (...) (25 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Bigger/better scans of 2000 sets?
 
Noooo, I mean the 7124, sorry - the all green Flash Speeder. It's got the 6081 and 6091 in green, it looks like, along with EIGHT green macaroni bricks, but it also looks like there are also more new pieces, but I need a more detailed scan to be (...) (25 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Bigger/better scans of 2000 sets?
 
Tom Stangl, VFAQman wrote in message <3822D923.1ED45825@vfaq.com>... (...) As I can tell, they are no macaroni bricks but bricks with rounded top (6081,6091?) laying at their side. Eric (25 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Bigger/better scans of 2000 sets?
 
(...) Good/Interesting parts I can see: (No macaroni Bricks(those are round-top bricks on their side, like Eric said)) 12 6091 1x2x1.3 round-top bricks 2 6191 1x4x1.3 round-top bricks 2 brown town seats 1 green "Set 4561 Nose" wedge 1 pair 2x3 (...) (25 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Bigger/better scans of 2000 sets?
 
Just a few nits: (...) actually 1x1x1.3 half-round with plate (6091) (...) actually 6081 (...) They are my favorite elements so please excuse my analness.... Analness?{;^D -John (...) (25 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Bigger/better scans of 2000 sets?
 
Hm, yeah, could be. In fact, there's a good chance you are right. Drat. Oh well, I want the 6081/6091 in green too ;-) (...) (25 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Bigger/better scans of 2000 sets?
 
Can we tell form the pic if the hat is brown or black? I sure hope it's brown. Eric (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Bigger/better scans of 2000 sets?
 
My guess is brown. -John (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Bigger/better scans of 2000 sets?
 
Well, what about the hands? The hands and hat look brown to me. They should be brown if they follow the true colors of the Naboo Royal Guards. Question: Has Lego ever made Brown Hands on a minifig? I don't think they did. Aaron (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Bigger/better scans of 2000 sets?
 
(...) Gaah! Why quibble over Semantics? ;) I generally use the overhead footprint when determining names. Besides, no one name is right. I did put in the part number, ya know. (...) Umm... Sorry, it is *not* part 6081. It does *not* have the (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Bigger/better scans of 2000 sets?
 
(...) Sure he could - there are many cases of sets having 2 stud widths at the legs, and 4 at the arms (the 1775 plane, for example. The cockpit could be 2-wide on the bottom, and his arms could be right over top of the studs on the 6081. In fact, (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Bigger/better scans of 2000 sets?
 
(...) I think it's time for a friendly wager. Meesa bet you Jar-Jar yessir! BTW I'm 0-2 in betting on SW sets. I lost a buck thinking the Gungan Sub was purple. Then I lost another bet thinking the Grimace was blue, not purple:-p Smart money might (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR