Subject:
|
Re: Bigger/better scans of 2000 sets?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Nov 1999 09:12:29 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
johnneal@uswestNOMORESPAM.net
|
Viewed:
|
1805 times
|
| |
|
|
Jeff Stembel wrote:
> In lugnet.starwars, John Neal writes:
> > Just a few nits:
> >
> > Jeff Stembel wrote:
> >
> > > In lugnet.starwars, Tom Stangl writes:
> > > > Noooo, I mean the 7124, sorry - the all green Flash Speeder.
> > > >
> > > > It's got the 6081 and 6091 in green, it looks like, along with EIGHT green
> > > > macaroni bricks, but it also looks like there are also more new pieces, but
> > > > I need a more detailed scan to be sure.
> > >
> > > Good/Interesting parts I can see:
> > > (No macaroni Bricks(those are round-top bricks on their side, like Eric
> > > said))
> > >
> > > 12 6091 1x2x1.3 round-top bricks
> >
> > actually 1x1x1.3 half-round with plate (6091)
>
> Gaah! Why quibble over Semantics? ;) I generally use the overhead footprint
> when determining names. Besides, no one name is right. I did put in the part
> number, ya know.
> >
> > > 2 6191 1x4x1.3 round-top bricks
> >
> > actually 6081
>
> Umm... Sorry, it is *not* part 6081. It does *not* have the recessed plate on
> the side. The 'fig couldn't fit if it did. Trust me, I've studied the
> pictures.
> >
> > > 2 brown town seats
> > > 1 green "Set 4561 Nose" wedge
> > > 1 pair 2x3 half-wedge bricks
> > > Lots of green plates
> > >
> > > If I notice anything else, I'll let you know.
> >
> > They are my favorite elements so please excuse my analness....
> > Analness?{;^D
> >
> > -John
>
> No prob, but I know bricks, and I know I'm right about the second one. :)
I think it's time for a friendly wager. Meesa bet you Jar-Jar yessir! BTW I'm
0-2 in betting on SW sets. I lost a buck thinking the Gungan Sub was purple. Then
I lost another bet thinking the Grimace was blue, not purple:-p Smart money might
be on you, Jeff;^)
-John
Is this the right room for an argument?
I've told you once.
No, you haven't.
Yes, I have.
When?
Just now.
No, you didn't.
I did.
No, you didn't.
Did.
Didn't.
I'm telling you I did.
You did not.
Oh, I'm sorry, just one moment- is this the 5 minute argument or the full half
hour?
>
>
> Jeff
> "I've had enough. I will not allow this! I will pay you back; because
> forgiveness, for one like you, could never be an option."
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Bigger/better scans of 2000 sets?
|
| (...) Gaah! Why quibble over Semantics? ;) I generally use the overhead footprint when determining names. Besides, no one name is right. I did put in the part number, ya know. (...) Umm... Sorry, it is *not* part 6081. It does *not* have the (...) (27 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
