Subject:
|
Re: Bigger/better scans of 2000 sets?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Nov 1999 01:04:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
393 times
|
| |
|
|
Jeff Stembel wrote:
>
> > > 2 6191 1x4x1.3 round-top bricks
> >
> > actually 6081
>
> Umm... Sorry, it is *not* part 6081. It does *not* have the recessed plate on
> the side. The 'fig couldn't fit if it did. Trust me, I've studied the
> pictures.
Sure he could - there are many cases of sets having 2 stud widths at the
legs, and 4 at the arms (the 1775 plane, for example.
The cockpit could be 2-wide on the bottom, and his arms could be right over
top of the studs on the 6081.
In fact, look DIRECTLY under the left hand of the pilot at
http://www.theouterrim.com/legopics4.jpg - looks like a stud to me.
Hopefully we'll find out soon, as someone has already seen a 2000
minicatalog in a Snow Speeder.
--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Bigger/better scans of 2000 sets?
|
| (...) Gaah! Why quibble over Semantics? ;) I generally use the overhead footprint when determining names. Besides, no one name is right. I did put in the part number, ya know. (...) Umm... Sorry, it is *not* part 6081. It does *not* have the (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
