Subject:
|
Re: fan of both, hoping for the best
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 Oct 1998 22:38:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
751 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998 11:16:14 GMT, Richard Franks
<richard@__no_spam_please_im_veggie__spider.com> wrote:
> Maybe it's a cunning ploy on the side of the trekkies to win the
> Federation vs Empire arguments -
I vaguely remember reading one comparison between ST and SW. They
were comparing characters and technologies, and who would win in a
fight. It was amusing. Kirk vs. Vader. :-)
Vader wins the fight, but hey, Kirk gets the chicks! Picard just
stands around ruminating responsibilities. :-)
There was only one thing I really disagreed with; which is better -
blaster rifle or hand phaser. They came out for the blaster as the
better weapon. Oh come on! The blaster was pitiful! And very
inaccurate (unless the good guys were shooting).
Heck, a phaser on kill would toast the target in one accurate shot.
No comparison. To each their own, I guess.
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: fan of both, hoping for the best
|
| Terry K wrote in message <361beb9c.14325267@l...et.com>... (...) Kirk was so much better than Picard. What a wuss. (...) It's called the stormtrooper effect, and can be seen throughout the SW movies. The more people shooting and the more obvious the (...) (26 years ago, 8-Oct-98, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: fan of both, hoping for the best
|
| (...) Maybe it's a cunning ploy on the side of the trekkies to win the Federation vs Empire arguments - if they design the Empirical fleet they can pick holes in it ;) "ah.. but if picard shot a dual-phased polarising beam within a reversed neutrino (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.starwars)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
