Subject:
|
Re: Sebulba
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Fri, 20 Aug 1999 14:31:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
316 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 12:07:53 GMT, "Eric Kingsley"
<kingsley@nelug.nospam.org> wrote:
> > Come to think of it, I can't bear the R2 units' feet either.
>
> I somewhat agree with you here but I just don't know how else they could have
> done it and kept him compatable with LEGO bricks. I mean a 1x1 foot would have
> been to small and although the 1x2 foot is a bit large I think it was the best
> compromise when it comes to LEGO dimensions.
I posted a message about this awhile ago. Basically, they could have made
the feet smaller, and put in slots in the base for studs to fit into. Like
you see on the bottom of round parts.
> What bothered me more was the R2
> heads. The design leave them with a big white collar.
Yeah, that was lame.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Sebulba
|
| (...) I agree with you totally but at least you don't end up with 1 in ever set (Not quite but it seems like it) like you do with Jar Jar. I can't stand Jar Jar's head for most of the same reasons that the Sebulba fig is awful (Lack of color etc.) . (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
