 | | Re: Sebulba —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | (...) I agree with you totally but at least you don't end up with 1 in ever set (Not quite but it seems like it) like you do with Jar Jar. I can't stand Jar Jar's head for most of the same reasons that the Sebulba fig is awful (Lack of color etc.) . (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Sebulba —Fraser Lovatt
|
| | | | | Eric said: (...) True -- you end up with a lot of Jar Jars if you're trying to build up those stocks of battle droids, but at least these can be used as generic Gungans and then slaughtered mercilessly. Which is as it should be. F (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Sebulba —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) I posted a message about this awhile ago. Basically, they could have made the feet smaller, and put in slots in the base for studs to fit into. Like you see on the bottom of round parts. (...) Yeah, that was lame. Steve (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | R2D2 head (was Re: Sebulba) —Robert Munafo
|
| | | | (...) I believe this is a result of the fact that the equipment at LEGO that applies patterns to pieces can only "paint" the pattern from one side (one "direction"). Since the R2D2 head is a "hemisphere", the pattern had to be applied from the top, (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
