Subject:
|
Re: USC Star Destroyer scale fighters, MF, and Shuttle!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Mon, 30 Sep 2002 14:29:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
744 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Jeff Jardine writes:
> In lugnet.starwars, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> > >
> > > Maybe this A-wing would be closer to scale:
> > >
> > > http://www.bricklink.com/P/1/752.gif
> >
> >
> > Uh... isn't that piece larger than the 'X-Wing' piece I used? As to why I
> > made them same size... well that is why I put the 'X-Wing' on a 45 degree
> > angle to make it longer. None of the other parts really fit and they are
> > close enough when using this scale. It was more for fun than accuraccy
> > anyway. :-)
>
> This is serious business.(1)
>
> Have a look at this:
> http://news.lugnet.com/market/shipping/?n=542
>
> "Hose Flexible End 1 x 1 x 2/3 without Tabs" has a weight of 0.103g
> "Plate 1 x 1" has a weight of 0.176g
>
> The dimensions of a 1x1 plate are appx 8mm x 8mm x 5mm
> If you turn it diagonally, the length and width are 11.3mm
> The dimensions of a hose end are appx 6.3mm in diameter, and 6.4mm long
> (these measurements come from http://www.lugnet.com/~330/FAQ/Build/dimensions)
>
> So, although a hose end on it's side will slightly taller than a 1x1 plate,
> it will still be shorter and narrower. And it's shape is more A-wing-like.
But it will also be twice as 'fat' as the X-wing. :-)
A little too long or a little too wide. Hmmmm. Decisions, decisions.
> (1) No, it isn't! ;)
-Mike Petrucelli
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: USC Star Destroyer scale fighters, MF, and Shuttle!
|
| (...) This is serious business.(1) Have a look at this: (URL) Flexible End 1 x 1 x 2/3 without Tabs" has a weight of 0.103g "Plate 1 x 1" has a weight of 0.176g The dimensions of a 1x1 plate are appx 8mm x 8mm x 5mm If you turn it diagonally, the (...) (22 years ago, 30-Sep-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
